Sunday, May 8, 2011

#3 Technology and Social Interaction

Technology makes social interaction a potential constant. Before this technology evolved, true alone time existed. Today, even when you are alone, you can see what your friends are doing, be in contact with the push of a button, and before you know it you are not really alone. I think it has the potential to make us devalue personal face-to-face reactions. At the same time, when I think about memories of friends, the most important and meaningful ones do not come from text conversations or facebook wall posts. They come from the spontaneity of real life interactions complete with body language, awkward silences, and the unpredictability.

I do think there is a lot to be said about the creation of an online community. For people with very specific or unique interests, technology makes it easier for them to find people who also have the same interests, making them feel less alone and more understood. For someone who enjoys football, they have an already readily available network of potential friends with a similar interest. But for someone who has very specialized interests, or who doesn’t live in a very diverse or accepting geographical area, these tools are absolutely invaluable to helping them find their niche. Fan sites and virtual realities assume the same purpose, and I think usage of these networks is fine as long as one doesn’t allow their virtual reality to become more important than real life.

Dating sites are one of the most fascinating aspects of the intersection between social interaction and technology for me personally. Just looking at the sheer number of how many couples meet online and through dating sites is amazing. I definitely am interested to see if these relationships are more successful or last longer than traditional couples but only time will reveal that data. The reason that these relationships work is because they merge their online match up into real life right away. I think that you cannot really know someone until you interact in real life. It is very easy to put on a fake persona when communicating online or long distance through phone calls and texting. I do not believe that having a solely online relationship is sustainable or healthy. Integrating a romantic partner into your life requires them to know your friends, and family, and that is very hard to achieve through purely online relationships.

I think as far as society creating more public squares in real life as opposed to message boards and online communities, I don’t foresee that strategy being too successful. Online communities allow quiet and shy people the chance to express their opinions. How well of a public speaker you are, how attractive, how many friends you have in the audience is not so much an issue online as it is in real life and by reverting back to traditional methods, the ideas of those quiet people become silenced.

Overall, I believe that there are many positive outcomes on social interaction due to technology. I think that these can be used as tools to expand relationships and help to preserve old relationships. I do feel that there are dangers associated with losing yourself in the online world and disconnecting from the real world. Like all things in life, finding a healthy balance is key.

#1 My Media Consumption

For 5 days (three weekdays, and two weekend days) I logged my time spent consuming media. Here are the facts:

DAY 1: Wednesday

TV : TOTAL: 1.5 HOURS

1.5 Hours OnDemand entertainment shows

Radio: TOTAL: 15 MINUTES

15 minutes of radio – music in the car

Computer: TOTAL: ABOUT 4.5 HOURS

Checking e-mail: periodically throughout the day: 30 minutes

Facebook: 1 hour

Online News Articles: 30 Minutes

Entertainment: YouTube videos: 10 minutes

Homework related: 2 hours

Phone: TOTAL: 35 MINUTES

Texting: 20 minutes

Voice calls: 5 minutes

E-mail: 5 minutes

Games/Apps: 5 minutes

Books: TOTAL: 1 HOUR

For class: 1 hour

DAY 2: Thursday

TV : TOTAL: 0 HOURS

Radio: TOTAL: 5 MINUTES

5 minutes of radio – music in the car

Computer: TOTAL: ABOUT 2 HOURS

Checking e-mail: periodically throughout the day: 20 minutes

Facebook: 45 minutes

Online News Articles: 0 Minutes

Entertainment: YouTube videos: 0 minutes

Homework related: 1 hour

Phone: TOTAL: 25 MINUTES

Texting: 15 minutes

Voice calls: 5 minutes

E-mail: 5 minutes

Games/Apps: 0 minutes

Books: TOTAL: 0 minutes (sorry professors, it’s cinco de mayo!)

DAY 3: Friday

TV : TOTAL: 0 HOURS

Radio: TOTAL: 10 MINUTES

10 minutes of music in the car

Computer: TOTAL: ABOUT 5 HOURS

Checking e-mail: periodically throughout the day: 30 minutes

Facebook: 45 minutes

Online News Articles: 30 Minutes

Entertainment: YouTube videos: 10 minutes

Homework related: 2 hours

Phone: TOTAL: 35 MINUTES

Texting: 20 minutes

Voice calls: 5 minutes

E-mail: 5 minutes

Games/Apps: 5 minutes

Books: TOTAL: 0 Minutes

DAY 4: Saturday

TV : TOTAL: 2.5 HOURS

Watched movies with friends

Radio: TOTAL: 0 MINUTES

Computer: TOTAL: 15 ABOUT MINUTES

Checking e-mail: periodically throughout the day: 5 minutes

Facebook: 10 minutes

Online News Articles: 0 Minutes

Entertainment: YouTube videos: 0 minutes

Homework related: 0 hours

Phone: TOTAL: 20 MINUTES

Texting: 10 minutes

Voice calls: 5 minutes

E-mail: 5 minutes

Games/Apps: 0 minutes

Books: TOTAL: 0 MINUTES

DAY 5: Sunday

TV : TOTAL: 2 HOURS

Watched TV with friends while doing homework

Radio: TOTAL: 5 MINUTES

5 minutes of radio – music in the car

Computer: TOTAL: ABOUT 5 HOURS

Checking e-mail: periodically throughout the day: 30 minutes

Facebook: 1 hour

Online News Articles: 30 Minutes

Entertainment: YouTube videos: 0 minutes

Homework related: 3 hours

Phone: TOTAL: 30 MINUTES

Texting: 15 minutes

Voice calls: 10 minutes

E-mail: 5 minutes

Games/Apps: 0 minutes

Books: TOTAL: 45 MINUTES

For class: 45 Minutes


My social location definitely determined my media usage. As you can probably easily see from the data above, my media intake changed drastically on the weekend compared to the weekdays. This is because during the weekend I spent more time out of the house with friends, going places, and simply just hanging out with others. The only times I ever watched TV was with friends. In addition, when I was with friends, my need for facebook was not apparent, which definitely makes more sense. As a social person, when I am alone and feel the desire for social contact, I turn to facebook. However, when I am surrounded by friends, that need is fulfilled. In addition, most of my time spent on my computer was for homework, and while doing homework facebook was always open, and I would check it periodically. I think that my media use is typical for other people my age. I think my generation texts more than we talk on the phone generally, probably because it is easier for us to multitask while texting than on the phone. I think that this says something about society and the desire for American's to be constantly connected but also being highly productive and efficient. I think that by looking at my media usage, one can infer that I am social but also spend my time alone working on schoolwork. This week was pretty representative of a typical week, which usually contains busy weeks focused on school weeks, and weekends spent going out and having fun (until Sunday!).


Thursday, May 5, 2011

Would You Still Be Around?

My first post on technology and health focused on just a couple health risks associated with technology usage. However, as an avid optimist and rational thinker, it would be absurd to neglect the positive health outcomes associated with technology. By simply looking at average life span expectancies over the last few hundred years, you can see we are living much longer. But why?


One could argue on behalf of evolution – that the current humans are more resilient, stronger, better adapted. The truth is, technological advancements are keeping us alive longer. This is due to better prevention methods such as screening abilities, medicines, and surgical procedures, as well as prolonging the lifespan by delaying the effects of terminal diseases.


ABC news published a list of their top 10 advances that have changed the world. I thought this article was extremely interesting since we take most of these advances for granted. I like to play the fun game I call “Would I still be here if _____ didn’t exist?”. The truth is, there is a high chance I wouldn’t have made it the 21 years I have without some of these health technologies, so I thought I would share them and give some insight into their consequences.


1. Vaccines

2. Surgical Anesthetic and Antisepsis

3. Clean Water and Improved Sanitation

4. Antibiotics and Antivirals

5. Birth Control Pills

6. Improvements in Heart Surgery and Cardiac Care

7. Randomized Controlled Trials

8. Radiologic Imaging

9. Advancements in Childbirth

10. Organ Transplantation


You may be thinking that these don’t meet your typical definition of technology. The images that first come to my head when I think about technology are computers, machines, new synthetic materials, etc. However, if you look at each of the above health advancements, they are all possible because of technology. Technology was needed in order to analyze and test medicines and vaccines. Technology is responsible for clean water. It is pretty easy to see how technology is responsible for radiologic imaging and surgical improvements.


If I lived a few thousand years ago, I probably would have died at birth due to sicknesses that were easily treated in 1989. However, if I survived that, oh and all the other diseases that I was vaccinated for as a child, and all the sicknesses I took antibiotics for, I probably would have been eaten by a predator. Seriously, I have really bad eyesight. This isn’t even a problem today with glasses and contacts, but now, there is Lasik. Lasik eye surgery takes minutes, and uses a machine that is so accurate that there are really low risks, and there you go, perfect vision just like that.

While having perfect eyesight is obviously not the most important health improvement to come along, it is a perfect example of how technology can improve our lives in ways previously thought unimaginable. Sure, having easy access to information and constant social contact is convenient and nice, but the technology that really matters the most is often overlooked and taken for granted. If we play the “would I still be around” game a little more often, we can really appreciate what technology can do for us. It is also important to remember that many people across the world still die from things that are easily treatable. We have the technology, but now we need to share it and give others the same chances that we had.